Operational value creation models in Private Equity have been historically focusing on the following levers: sales and margins’ improvement, cost efficiency and capital reduction, capital efficiency, shared services, and, most recently, – geographical diversification and digitalization. In this context, the importance of the human lever has been underestimated for a long time and is nowadays gaining more and more weight in portfolio management.
Yet, according to the Harvard Business Review, between 70% and 90% of acquisitions fail to meet their financial expectations. One of the key factors that lead to these dynamics is attributed to the misalignment of talent strategies, capabilities, and cultures of portfolio companies with those of acquiring entities.
This phrase sounds like a “cliché” unless we give it a deep reflection from the accounting and financial planning perspective. ISO has recently introduced ISO 30414, the first International Standard of Human Capital Reporting allowing organizations of all sizes to get a clear view of the actual contribution of its human capital. Yet, many traditional and financial engineering and reporting models used by PE firms still look at the human capital from a purely cost perspective.
Making direct links between human capital and portfolio returns of a company is complicated, at times controversial, and a very sensitive topic. Nevertheless, there is definitely a benefit of using quantitative frameworks for human capital evaluation and its alignment with other organizational areas so as to support pre and post-deal decision making. One possible way to do so is through the use of scorecards, where skills and competencies are weighted against the firm’s strategic objectives, which, in turn, would result in economic benefits.
Likewise, HR Due Diligence should go far beyond evaluating HR risks and costs associated with a deal. It should involve a thorough quantitative analysis of the skills and capabilities of key employees as well as their overall alignment with the future organizational structure, culture, and financial objectives. Effective assessment models would allow a firm to better forecast financial returns of HR-related decisions, as well as to quantify expected economic benefits arising from aligning teams, competencies, and cultures of the entities with the organizational strategy post-closure. PE firms would also benefit from putting more emphasis on developing cross-portfolio capabilities post-closure, as well as on creating flexible organizational structures that encourage growth and innovation.
Resistance to change is part of our human nature. Today, in the era of transformation, change and uncertainty, early engagement of employees in organizational transformation processes is directly linked with their willingness to embrace change and better understand its positive impact on their future career and the organization as a whole. Employees are much more likely to support and adopt change when they feel invested in the process and outcome.
Yet, this is another delicate aspect of an acquisition process, as a lot of information must remain confidential until the deal is secured. Engaging employees after the deal is formally announced can bear risks of creating unnecessary tensions within the staff, making them feel insecure, misinformed, and even undervalued. Yet, many of them will have to form part of an organizational muscle during the first 100 days and beyond.
In this context, how would a PE firm keep employees engaged throughout the deal lifecycle? Here are some thoughts:
According to the Global Private Equity Industry Report published by Bain & Company back in 2015, the primary reason why PE firms were failing to achieve target returns was due to the appointment of wrong leaders to run portfolio companies. Five years later, despite PE getting stronger and mature as an industry, Bain & Company still emphasize that individual lead managers matter more than the PE firm in deal returns. Getting back to the monetary aspect of human capital in Private Equity firms, we might be talking about multi-million pound/euro losses when it comes to appointing a wrong portfolio company CEO.
We always say businesses, products/services, and solutions do not fail – people fail! If you want your business, your products/services, or your solutions to succeed, invest in finding the best people. Nowadays, more and more PE firms realize the importance of diversifying their technical expertise to effectively implement transformation processes. Many focus on building strong networks of operating partners with specific functional orientations to quickly fix technical gaps in portfolio companies. Yet, the role of a CEO remains pivotal in effectively implementing the new culture within a team and effectively driving it through the path to growth.
Having worked on many strategic CEO placements in PE-backed companies, we have identified a few key characteristics and leadership traits a good portfolio company CEO needs to hold:
Of course, each company presents unique challenges at any given time within their business lifecycle; they have their idiosyncratic environment, values, and visions which require a unique approach to their leadership selection criteria and an extensive critique of the levels of leadership competency required to achieve the critical results needed. Our EMEAA CEO calls this ‘situational leadership’ and I quite like that description because it challenges the selection committee on many levels, but most importantly, to think beyond replacing like for like using the previous role description to determine the search parameters of the new leader – we know this to be committing to a life stuck in the past ultimately ceding the future to your competitors. For partners and deal teams responsible for operational Due Diligence, it is worth mentioning again that sourcing of a great CEO should start long before the completion of acquisition so that she/he is in the full capacity from day 1 of the 100-days plan.
More deal teams are finding value in human-capital due diligence processes which are shown to deliver significant improvements post-closure and enable the ability of a PE firm to move with speed and agility in the instance the unexpected happens with other key value drivers in the newly acquired businesses, bringing long-term value and resilience into portfolio companies.
This article was co-authored by Gordon Berridge
This website uses cookies.