Comments on: Who’s In Charge? https://www.n2growth.com/whos-in-charge/ We Find & Develop The World's Best Leaders Mon, 28 Oct 2019 21:05:15 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 By: Leadership and Success | Practical Managers https://www.n2growth.com/whos-in-charge/#comment-4995 Fri, 01 Oct 2010 11:01:52 +0000 https://www.n2growth.com/?p=1236#comment-4995 […] Who’s in Charge […]

]]>
By: mikemyatt https://www.n2growth.com/whos-in-charge/#comment-4994 Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:47:59 +0000 https://www.n2growth.com/?p=1236#comment-4994 In reply to Susan mazza.

Well said – your comment offers both sound thinking and sage counsel Susan. Technical competency and leadership acumen while often confused, are not always one in the same. Thanks for sharing.

]]>
By: Susan mazza https://www.n2growth.com/whos-in-charge/#comment-4993 Thu, 02 Sep 2010 21:20:50 +0000 https://www.n2growth.com/?p=1236#comment-4993 I actually think the structure, including the culture and practices for maintaining that structure, is part of the problem. One of the reasons I think some organizations end up charging sub-par leaders with mission critical objectives is that leaders of projects are all too often chosen based on position in their hierarchy. If your practices for promotion and your ability to assess and develop leadership capability as people move through your structure (especially "up the ladder") you are likely to keep making the same mistake. I know a lot of very technically competent people who got to high levels in their organizations because of their knowledge, experience and technical capability but remain weak and even uninterested in developing their leadership capability.

Regarding your bottom line that "everyone wants to be in charge, but few are willing to take ownership". I'd add that the best leaders are not only both personally responsible and accountable, but also are effective at eliciting that mindset and behavior in others. We do not give near enough attention to the latter as a critical skill in developing leaders and still end up with far to many people in high level positions who rely on authority rather than effective practices to deliver results.

]]>
By: mikemyatt https://www.n2growth.com/whos-in-charge/#comment-4992 Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:47:04 +0000 https://www.n2growth.com/?p=1236#comment-4992 In reply to pastortom2022.

Hi Tom:

Thanks for your comments Tom. I'm always appreciative of being able to glean insights from experienced leaders such as yourself. From my perspective the issue isn't that struggles exist regarding subordinate leaders executing the vision and plans set forth by upper level leadership, for this is certainly a struggle in many environments. Rather the real question should be why such struggles exist in some organizations and not in others. It all boils down to leadership ability. Why do some leaders make the right hires, deploy talent properly, get the right amount of buy-in, align expectations, understand the value of delegating authority , have value alignment, etc., while others fail to do so? I've been around long enough to see all types of leadership styles both succeed and fail. The issue isn't the type of leadership structure utilized, but whether the leadership structure meshes with the talent, culture, context, etc. In the end, it's important to note that your 10% initiation and 90% follow-up will work in any structure if done well. Thanks for sharing Tom…

]]>
By: pastortom2022 https://www.n2growth.com/whos-in-charge/#comment-4991 Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:57:07 +0000 https://www.n2growth.com/?p=1236#comment-4991 Great post Mike. Ultimately I see struggles on both secular and spiritual fronts regarding managers and subordinate leaders executing the vision and plans set forth by upper level leaders. I totally understand the responsibility of CEO's and upper level leadership regarding completion and execution. I make sure that I am totally prepared to take responsibility for failures of those I manage and serve. Your point is valid and bears repeating…f the individuals placed in charge of executing key objectives, deliverables & results are not excellent leaders, you are simply setting yourself up for failure. The strongest argument for great leadership is what happens in its absence. I totally support the concept that leadership is 10% initiation and 90% follow-up.

]]>
By: mikemyatt https://www.n2growth.com/whos-in-charge/#comment-4990 Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:20:35 +0000 https://www.n2growth.com/?p=1236#comment-4990 In reply to James Strock.

Hi Jim:

I think you worked your way through answering your own question 🙂 I agree that your point is not contradictory, in fact, I believe it is accretive in that a broader and deeper base of leadership only adds value to an organization. I think you summed it up well by stating that: "…the best leaders are creating leaders…" – Indeed. Thanks for adding the keen insights Jim.

]]>
By: James Strock https://www.n2growth.com/whos-in-charge/#comment-4989 Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:13:24 +0000 https://www.n2growth.com/?p=1236#comment-4989 Wonderful post! Without leadership, accountability, things simply don't happen! One question: in addition to the hierarchy (focused accountability) you identify so well, is it still possible that leadership can emerge at any level? In thinking of your example of sports teams, for example, is it possible that leaders can emerge at different times, for different purposes or tasks? And would the same be true, in a related situation, ad hoc networks or teams in business? I don't see this as contradictory your point–the accountability and ultimate leadership must be stable and defined. Perhaps the best leaders are creating leaders, and this may have more fluidity today, given the rapidly evolving, less fixed organizational arrangements…..What are your thoughts? Thanks!

]]>
By: Mike Henry Sr. https://www.n2growth.com/whos-in-charge/#comment-4988 Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:19:36 +0000 https://www.n2growth.com/?p=1236#comment-4988 Great reminder Mike. No one remains a leader long without being competent. People will not long support someone who's going nowhere. And many young leaders lose focus on the team goal and focus on either being popular with their team or following the rules.

Those that accept responsibility for the team's results and do what it takes to make the team successful eventually succeed.

]]>
By: mikemyatt https://www.n2growth.com/whos-in-charge/#comment-4987 Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:31:34 +0000 https://www.n2growth.com/?p=1236#comment-4987 In reply to Dan Collins.

Thanks Dan…

I agree that the essence of great leadership is found in the acceptance of personal responsibility. Thanks for the great observation Dan and have a great week Sir.

]]>
By: Dan Collins https://www.n2growth.com/whos-in-charge/#comment-4986 Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:52:47 +0000 https://www.n2growth.com/?p=1236#comment-4986 Myatt,

All I can say to that is "Hooah". You echo the very essence of one of my favorite aphorisms with this post "The leader of any unit is only as good as the weakest member of his team". Great leadership entails personally assuming responsibility for every "hot potato", praising others for all accomplishments and inspiring others to think and act likewise.

]]>